December 20, 2012
by Admin
0 comments
Once the topic of the review is decided, providing a thorough review should be the first goal. When embarking on this endeavor, management scholars should consider the creative efforts often exhibited by seasoned journalists. Like a good reporter, scholars conducting a formal review should also seek to provide a comprehensive understanding of a given topic.
A comprehensive and thorough review involves examining the body of relevant conceptual and empirical works in top management outlets, as well as specialty outlets. For example, for a review piece about an entrepreneurial topic I would first look at papers published in top outlets such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Management, Organization Science, Strategic Management Journal, and Journal of Management Studies. Specialty journals such as Journal of Business Venturing, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, and Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal would also be important given the particular topic, and casting a wide net to include other excellent journals such as Academy of Management Learning and Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, and Personnel Psychology may also include relevant articles for a review piece.
I have been surprised at the number of JOM Review Issue proposals that only aspire to review a subset (such as a random sampling) of articles about a given topic or propose to sample from a limited number of journals to arrive at conclusions about insights in a particularly rich research stream. Examining a subset of articles may be more convenient, but the impact of the review will suffer.